SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT - THE GERM "THEORY" vs. TERRAIN "THEORY" DEBATE DOES NOT EXIST - PART 3 OF 3
In this final chapter of SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT I will firm up the foundation that initiated the truth of microbiology, in 1866, and then move onto the most prominent authentication of that original discovery. The thing about high profit falsehood is that it also takes a large amount of $$$ to sustain falsehood by repetitive content propaganda campaigns. The other pertinent detail on falsehood is that repercussions will eventually surface, which is what everyone is witnessing today. These things are dead obvious, for anyone who wishes to see it. It may be pertinent to note that by way of at least 2 significant forthcoming events, we can look forward to a blast of disclosure, bringing relief to millions, at this time.
Reference documents of items referred to in this video may be found at our (former) Truth Centre web site: www.rebuildthenation.ca
My contact information: divergentrealities1@gmail.com (questions or anyone wishing to receive further information on the discoveries of the Bechamp team)
Book list from video:
1) Bechamp or Pasteur? – A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology
Hume, Ethel D.
2) Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter – The Germ Theory Exploded
Pearson, R.B.
3) The Blood and Its Third Element
Bechamp, Pierre Jacques Antoine
4) The Microzyma Theory and the Microbial System, 495 pgs.
Bechamp, Pierre Jacques Antoine
5) Microzymas with heterogeneity, histogenesis, physiology and pathology (Ed. 1883)
Bechamp, Pierre Jacques Antoine
6) The Persecution & Trial of Gaston Naessens - The True Story of the Efforts to Suppress an Alternative Treatment for Cancer, AIDS, And Other Immunologically-Based Diseases (archive.org)
https://archive.org/details/persecutiontrial00bird
Bird, Christopher
7) The Galileo of the Microscope – The Life and Trials of Gaston Naessens
https://archive.org/details/galileoofmicrosc00bird
Bird, Christopher
Epilogue - Handling revolutionary truth here in 2025 - 31 Mar. 2025
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT - THE GERM "THEORY" vs. TERRAIN "THEORY" DEBATE DOES NOT EXIST - PART 3 OF 3
In this final chapter of SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT I will firm up the foundation that initiated the truth of microbiology, in 1866, and then move onto the most prominent authentication of that original discovery. The thing about high profit falsehood is that it also takes a large amount of $$$ to sustain falsehood by repetitive content propaganda campaigns. The other pertinent detail on falsehood is that repercussions will eventually surface, which is what everyone is witnessing today. These things are dead obvious, for anyone who wishes to see it. It may be pertinent to note that by way of at least 2 significant forthcoming events, we can look forward to a blast of disclosure, bringing relief to millions, at this time.
Reference documents of items referred to in this video may be found at our (former) Truth Centre web site: www.rebuildthenation.ca
My contact information: divergentrealities1@gmail.com (questions or anyone wishing to receive further information on the discoveries of the Bechamp team)
Book list from video:
1) Bechamp or Pasteur? – A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology
Hume, Ethel D.
2) Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter – The Germ Theory Exploded
Pearson, R.B.
3) The Blood and Its Third Element
Bechamp, Pierre Jacques Antoine
4) The Microzyma Theory and the Microbial System, 495 pgs.
Bechamp, Pierre Jacques Antoine
5) Microzymas with heterogeneity, histogenesis, physiology and pathology (Ed. 1883)
Bechamp, Pierre Jacques Antoine
6) The Persecution & Trial of Gaston Naessens - The True Story of the Efforts to Suppress an Alternative Treatment for Cancer, AIDS, And Other Immunologically-Based Diseases (archive.org)
https://archive.org/details/persecutiontrial00bird
Bird, Christopher
7) The Galileo of the Microscope – The Life and Trials of Gaston Naessens
https://archive.org/details/galileoofmicrosc00bird
Bird, Christopher
Epilogue - Handling revolutionary truth here in 2025 - 31 Mar. 2025
-
-
He talks as if from a mountain top.
I have read previously about changes in form of bacteria by a famous microbiologist.
Would be nice to have on his site or below this video links to the books he mentions, and perhaps some shorter articles before trying to get hold of massive tomes in French which have to be scanned and translated.
-
Thanks for your assertions.
The widespread coverage of evidence/books are only there for those who are intent on holding firm with falsehoods, if needed. The book list from the video has been added to this video description. Ethel Hume's book is straight forward and simple for anyone wishing to gain an introduction to the truth as discovered in the mid 1800s. It also includes R.B. Pearson's perspective on the matter.
The best source for shorter details/articles may be our website, as noted - choose the "Biological Truth" tab.
Further to this - the first entry of the software that I have is a rather short timeline biography of Professor Bechamp. I could part it off the file and send it out to anyone wishing to receive it (only 6.5kb, in English).
-
https://archive.org/details/persecutiontrial00bird
Clickable links more convenient.
And this has no downloadable files.
https://archive.org/details/galileoofmicrosc00bird
Nor this.
As I said, need some live links to shorter articles for an introduction if you want to foster wider distribution to this no doubt important but somewhat abstruse topic.
Of possible interest to others reading this:
https://biologyinsights.com/what-is-microbial-change-and-why-does-it-matter/
Microbial communities constantly shift in response to environmental conditions, interactions with other organisms, and genetic adaptations. These changes impact ecosystems, human health, and industrial applications such as agriculture and wastewater treatment.
Understanding microbial change is crucial because these organisms play a key role in nutrient cycling, disease dynamics, and ecosystem stability. Even minor alterations in their composition or function can have widespread ecological and biological effects.
-
-
Hey @Hedvig .... it may be a bit (very) difficult in digging through much of the microbiology base. It is very complex, very borad, multi-lingual, historic. Apears to be intentional. Combining / confusing bacteriology and virology.
@Dave Shearer is speaking to challenges from "Germ Theory". Using Viruses" as some "Boogy-man". Might have spent some time on the top of many mountains... provides humbling persepctives! Feels great.. have you climbed many mountains?
Which part / field of Microbiology are you interested in? Virology OR Microbiology? Needed to go to a definition of what Microbiology is. It "excludes Viruses!" Virsus are NOTspecifically named in definitions that I can find.
Have never heard of "Bacteria", becoming a virus or vice versa!
"Microbiologists study microscopic life forms and their processes, including bacteria, algae, fungi, and some types of parasites and their vectors."
"Microbiologists study microorganisms such as bacteria, algae, and fungi."
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/life-physical-and-social-science/microbiologists.htm
Are "Virsus" "microscopic life forms? If they are? Why are virsus, not specifically named in microbiology definitions?
Understanding you might want to learn more about Virology and not bacteria, algae, fungi and some parasite vestors? OK?
So far, using Freedom of Information requests; over 40 Countires, over 200 responses from "Credible, experts, scientists, researchers, virologists, microbiologists, bureaucrats; following legislated requirements to provide FACTS. A friend has been doing the FOI requests with her small team... Linked below. Easy reads...
No Virsu has EVER been found! None isolated; none purified with any DNA genomic signature from "nature". PS: Nature can not be patented! A Creator; not a Human" would have "Created" a natural Virus. If it exised.
If it exists? It does not exist! Never discovered! FOI evidence from World Experts. Not my words.Trust science?
Virus's that are "patented" have some "imaginary, in silico" (computer Model manufactured), "possible genome. Like a Microsoft Windows Computer Virus". That Mr. Gates built to make more money. "Buy my anti-virus software" or we'll steal and destory your computer and data!? "Ransome-wear?" Kind of like COVID, now!
Are you Ok with that understanding? Where to go from there? Depends on if that is the area of microbiology your interested in?
Ok, you want to read more... in English. Me too.
Virology? Such as the man made; SARS-COV-1; man made SARS-COV-2; Avian Influenza Virus? Is that the area you are focusing on?
Agree, much if of it is in French, German, not English. Ever wonder why?
Dr. Luck Montanier, also French (now past) did a lot of work on "the Covid Virus as well. Translated? Not sure. Do not think much is. Then there is that Mr. Christian Drosten a "famous virologist". German guy. Who lied about Covid "virus"; setting world panic. He speaks German and English. His "assumptions" are seriously flawed. Challenged by Dr. Luc Montagnier also a "Famous virologist".
Then challenging it with "evidence?". How does one "prove something invisible is real?" Proving a negative... is mostly... impossible.
The fight do democide over 400 Ostriches.. using a PCR-Test! Yep... Also used to "prove-COVID-19". When that is IMPOSSIBLE!
Dr, Kary Mullis stated "it is not possible to identify the source that DNA-Fragment came from!" His expertise!
Can't identify what the DNA fragment came from... and "Reverse engineer" what it MIGHT have come from.
Instead... "experts" (smarter than me... more educuated too). Are now using PCR-Tests and DNA fragments; to make 8- "Chromosomes". To prove a "Virus" exists.. when they have "NOTHING" to compare the 8-chromosomes too that WAS a natural virus! Specualtion, sorry. Expert opinions!" No evidence!
Reverse engineering DNA fragments to build "Possible protiens". Built in a computer model (in silico).
Apparently "discovered as common" in Dead Chickens, Duck, Turkeys... SMALL Birds. That were "Diagnosed" as having "The Flu!" In their, educated, expert opinions! Still NO EVIDENCE!
This arguement is being used to democide Ostriches.
Over 107, 000 "research papers on one web site. Using a PCR-Test. (over the maxium cycles of 20-30!) So ALL FALE POSITIVES, of SOMETHING! (Means one must read the science behind the PCR-Test!) Processes and warnings... from the last 6-years and longer. Scrubbed? Some, yes. Dr. Mullis also"Died mysteriosuly in 2019!
DNA Fragments to "reverse-engineer" into protiens. That "might be in a Virsus". Virus have NEVER been genomed. There is no "Base line" to compare "ASSUMPTIONS" too! Kind of a "Revolving logic. .That makes NO SENSE!
Microbiologist, studying "Bacteria" are not Virologists" studying "Virsus". So far, bacteria, does not magically become a virus. Pasture would argue that is possible. Antoine Beauchamp would demonstrate, not possible.
A good English book to read? "Bechamp or Pasteur? : A lost chapter in the history of biology"
https://archive.org/details/bechamporpasteur00hume_0
I read the book..... have done more digging. The book is well written. Long and relatively easy to read. Pasture, was "Friends" with the Old Elite class, (1884). Beauchamp, was not. He was also the better "Scientists" and Human. Pasture brought us a lot of grief. Might want to read that book, first.
Dr. Sam Bailey (and Mark) Also Dr. Tom Cowan. Have a great web site. With a lot to read, watch on Virus's never isloated, never purified, never proven any genome.
In a book.... well laid out. Some solid challenges to science methodologies used, and logic as well. Hope that helps. There is so much to consider. All interwoven. Sometimes, confusing. Why? "Their logic" makes no sense.... Just another perspective. Take Care.
-
Have read some re Pasteur an dBeauchamp. Saved to computer.
Yes love Dr. Sam and husband Mark. Have been following Dr. Cowan, Young and others for the last 5 years.
And clear the PCR, well explained by inventor Mullis, who called Fauci an idiot, was taken and misused by Drosten. And including DNA sequence of human chromosome no. 8 to program in was obvious tell.
The murdered African president gave lie to the so-called test with various substances, including papaya amongst other things.
The virus myth has had a long history for sure. And definitely never isolated or purified or satisfied Koch's Postulates.
Bacteria of course can be seen under a microscope and can apparently change form according to the terrain.
Interesting field to explore further.
-
Sounds good..... Coincidentally.... came to the same conclusion... must have read similar materials. The "PCR-Test Baseline" to compare an over cycled "Fragment" was also very likely; our own, damaged, human DNA - Chromosome 8. Looked into that area too. Helps us stay healthy! Suggesting. BC ussed 42-cycles (40 to 45).
The over-cycled fragments, confirm we are Humans! (Even as a "Fale positive!" (Sugesting a question. "Not something else? And what might that "something -else be?" Dr Mullis explained that really well too using Budist understandings. We are all part of everything... Still no Virus genome ever identifed! Christine Massey's work.)
Another Coincidence? The Ostrich PCR-Tests, were used to "identify' 8-chromosomes to "make possible protiens." (Not chromosome 8, instead 8-chromosomes! A twisted coincidence? On purpose?)
That "might be found in a virus." But hey... the borader "scientific community of experts, using over 107,000 research experiments, paid for with our Tax dollars; confirms those same 8-protein chromosomes. The wording in t he articles really matters. Also, occur in from "DEAD BIRDS". (Chickens, Ducks, turkeys,,but never recored in Dead Ostriches). Dr. Beauchamp suggested... microzymes. That were also different in living VS dead. samples! Living tissues VS dead tissues, already decomposing for at least 20-hours from the OStriches.... is what the CFIA used. Contaminated? Likely, YES! They have no Chain-of-Owernship".... Allowing for faked data!
That is what the UBC expert and his "Team of experts" are using as determeind by the CFIA. Who will not allow further live testing to define any "possible Avian Flu."
Still never confirming any virus! (Except, possibly an in silico version - of fakery!) Suggested that as the 107,000 articels supported each other; might they be using an incorrect premise to do their "Research". Leading to "failed expert opinions". Minus having any natural virus genome to compare to?" Have not heard back. Wonder why not? I am not any expert... just curious. Learning opportunties abound. Keep the Osrich's alive! Enjoy each day... so many fragments to learn....
-
They make it up as they go along.
Like making up DNA sequences in a lab, put in the hopper and crank up their trusty machine.
They put a bunch of pseudo scientific terms in their handy dandy word-salad spinner, give it to AI and print up articles for some bought and paid for 'medical journal.'
Eh voila!
Garbage in garbage out.
-
-
